|
|
![]() |
|
2007 Kriteria untuk Keunggulan Kinerja
4. Pengukuran, Analisa dan Pengelolaan Pengetahuan (90 pts)
Jelaskan bagaimana organisasi anda mengukur, menganalisa, menyelaraskan dan memperbaiki kinerjanya dengan menggunakan data dan informasi pada seluruh tingkatan dan diseluruh bagian organisasi. Jelaskan bagaimana anda secara sistematis menggunakan hasil review untuk mengevaluasi dan memperbaiki proses-proses? Dalam respon anda sertakan jawaban atas pertanyaan-pertanyaan berikut: a. Pengukuran Kinerja 1) Bagaimana anda memilih, mengumpulkan, menyelaraskan dan mengintegrasikan data dan informasi untuk menelusuri operasi harian dan untuk menelusuri kinerja organisasi menyeluruh, termasuk progres sasaran-sasaran strategis dan rencana-rencana kerja? Apa saja ukuran-ukuran kinerja utama organisasi anda? Bagaimana anda menggunakan data dan informasi ini mendukung pengambilan keputusan organisasi dan inovasi? 2) Bagaimana anda memilih dan memastikan secara efektif data dan informasi pembanding utama untuk mendukung operasional dan pengambilan keputusan strategis dan inovasi? 3) Bagaimana anda mengusahakan system pengukuran kinerja anda sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan arah bisnis? Bagaimana anda memastikan system pengukuran kinerja anda sensitive terhadap perubahan organisasi maupun luar yang cepat dan tak terduga? b. Analisa dan Kajian Kinerja 1) Bagaimana anda mereview kinerja dan kemampuan organisasi? Bagaimana Para Pemimpin Senior berperan pada kajian tersebut? Analisa apa yang anda lakukan untuk mendukung kajian-kajian kinerja ini dan untuk menjamin bahwa kesimpulan-kesimpulannya adalah valid? Bagaimana anda menggunakan hasil kajian ini untuk mengasses kesuksesan organisasi, kinerja kempetitif, dan progres relatif terhadap sasaran-sasaran strategis dan rencana-rencana kerja? Bagaimana anda menggunakan hasil kajian ini untuk mengasses kemampuan organisasi anda merespon secara cepat perubahan kebutuhan-kebutuhan organisasi dan tantangan-tantangan yang ada pada lingkungan operasi anda? 2) Bagaimana anda menterjemahkan temuan kajian kinerja organisasi menjadi prioritas untuk perbaikan yang luar biasa (breaktrough) dan terus menerus untuk peluang-peluang inovasi? Bagaimana peluang-peluang dan prioritas-prioritas ini diterapkan kepada kelompok kerja dan tingkat oerasional fungsi diseluruh organisasi untuk memampukan dukungan yang efektif pada pengambilan keputusan mereka? Bila memungkinkan, bagaimana prioritas-prioritas dan peluang-peluang itu diterapkan terhadap pemasok-pemasok dan para mitra untuk memastikan keselarasan organisasi? 3) Bagaimana anda mengakomodasikan hasil-hasil review kinerja organisasi pada evaluasi dan perbaikan proses-proses utama secara sistematis? |
|
HyperLinked Kriteria Items: 1.1 - 1.2 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 3.1 - 3.2 - 4.1 - 4.2 - 5.1 - 5.2 - 5.3 - 6.1 - 6.2 - 7.1 - 7.2 - 7.3 - 7.4 - 7.5 - 7.6 - P.0 - P.1 - P.2 |
2007 Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence
4. Measurement, Analysis and Knowledge Management (90 pts)
The
Measurement, , and Knowledge Management Category examines HOW your organization selects, gathers, analyzes, manages, and improves its data, information, and KNOWLEDGE ASSETS. Also examined is HOW your organization reviews its PERFORMANCE.| 4.1 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement of Organizational Performance: How do you measure, analyze, and review organizational performance (45 pts.) |
Process |
|
Describe HOW your organization MEASURES, ANALYZES, ALIGNS, reviews, and improves its PERFORMANCE at all LEVELS and in all parts of your organization. Within your response, include answers to the following questions: a. Performance Measurement (1) HOW do you select, collect, ALIGN, and integrate data and information for tracking daily operations and for tracking overall organizational PERFORMANCE, including progress relative to STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS? What are your KEY organizational PERFORMANCE MEASURES? HOW do you use these data and information to support organizational decision making and INNOVATION? (2) HOW do you select and ensure the EFFECTIVE use of KEY COMPARATIVE DATA and INFORMATION and information to support operational and strategic decision making and INNOVATION? (3) HOW do you keep your PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM current with business needs and directions? HOW do you ensure that your PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM is sensitive to rapid or unexpected organizational or external changes? b. Performance Analysis and Review (1) HOW do you review organizational PERFORMANCE and capabilities? HOW do your SENIOR LEADERS participate in these reviews? What ANALYSES do you perform to support these reviews and to ensure that conclusions are valid? HOW do you use these reviews to assess organizational success, competitive PERFORMANCE, and progress relative to STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS? HOW do you use these reviews to assess your organization’s ability to rapidly respond to changing organizational needs and challenges in your operating environment? (2) HOW do you translate organizational PERFORMANCE review findings into priorities for continuous and breakthrough improvement and into opportunities for INNOVATION? HOW are these priorities and opportunities DEPLOYED to work group- and functional-level operations throughout your organization to enable EFFECTIVE support for their decision making? When appropriate, HOW are the priorities and opportunities DEPLOYED to your suppliers and PARTNERS to ensure organizational ALIGNMENT? (3) HOW do you incorporate the results of organizational PERFORMANCE reviews into thr SYSTEMATIC evaluation and improvement of KEY PROCESSES? |
|
Notes: N1. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT is used in fact-based decision making for setting and ALIGNING organizational directions and resource use at the work unit, KEY PROCESS, departmental, and whole organization levels. N2. COMPARATIVE DATA and INFORMATION and information (4.1a[2]) are obtained by BENCHMARKING and by seeking competitive comparisons. “BENCHMARKING” refers to identifying PROCESSES and RESULTS that represent best practices and PERFORMANCE for similar activities, inside or outside your organization’s industry. Competitive comparisons relate your organization’s PERFORMANCE to that of competitors in your markets. N3. Organizational PERFORMANCE reviews (4.1b[1]) should be informed by organizational PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT and guided by the STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS described in Item 2.1 and Item 2.2. The reviews also might be informed by internal or external Baldrige assessments. N4. ANALYSIS includes examining TRENDS; organizational, industry, and technology projections; and comparisons, cause-effect relationships, and correlations intended to support your PERFORMANCE reviews, help determine root causes, and help set priorities for resource use. Accordingly, ANALYSIS draws upon all types of data: CUSTOMER-related, financial and market, operational, and competitive. N5. The RESULTS of organizational PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS should contribute to organizational strategic planning in Category 2. N6. Your organizational PERFORMANCE RESULTS should be reported in Item 7.1, Item 7.2, Item 7.3, Item 7.4, Item 7.5, and Item 7.6. |
|
For additional description of this Item, see 4.1 Measurement, Analysis, and Review of Organizational Performance Item Description. |
2006 Baldrige English version format on this site is provided by Paul Steel: www.baldrige21.com; tqi@msn.com
© 2005 WEDNet Indonesia. All rights reserved